AMERICAN NEDICINE® LICENSING BOARD

National Board Certification and Licensing for Physicians of Natural Medicine

HOME

TRADEMARK

ELIGIBILITY

BOARD EXAM

SCHOOLS

APPLICATION

RESEARCH

PAYMENT

EXAMINATION

INSURANCE

LETTERS

Naturopathy

Statutes

Regulation

Philosophy

Tenth Amendment

Jurisdiction

Involuntary Servitude

Declaration

Exposition

Scope of Practice

Traditional VS. Conventional

Florida

Idaho Act

Minnesota

CONTACT US

UPDATES

Cease & Desist Order

Florida's Opposition

Florida Law

Law Suit

Press Release 2/10/06

ESPANOL I

Español - Naturopatía

Español - Exposición

Español - Florida

Español - Tradicional VS. Convencional

Español - Minnesota

Español - Ley de Idaho

Español - Décima Enmienda

Español-Autoridad

Español - Estatutos

Español – Jurisdicción

Español - Esfera de la Práctica

Español -Trabajo Involuntario

Español - Regulación

Español - Filosofía

Anuncio Publico

CERTIFICATE OF REG.

LO ULTIMO

 

Philosophy


January 24, 2005

Ms. Judith Peters
Office of the Attorney General
6 State House Station
Augusta, Maine 04333-0006

RE: Clarification of issues raised by the State of Maine, Washington and Alaska 

Dear Ms Peters:

Please observe the diploma of your licensees and note that the title on their degree is Doctor of Naturopathic Medicine (N.M.D.) and not Doctor of Naturopathy (N.D.).  The state, by inappropriately using the abbreviation (N.D.) for the title Doctor of Naturopathic Medicine (N.M.D.), is usurping the authority of the dictionary as the most authoritative source for defining the correct abbreviations within the English language.  According to the dictionary, when abbreviating phrases all the words in the phrase must be abbreviated.  A phrase is not properly abbreviated if only some of the words in the phrase are abbreviated, as explained in more detail in the document dated September 28, 2004.

The only phrase dealing with the word “naturopath” to which the state has an exclusive right is the title Doctor of Naturopathic Medicine (N.M.D.), which is the title of their licensees.  The Doctor of Naturopathic Medicine (N.M.D.) must use their designated title and not any other title given them by a state government because the legislature and licensing board does not have the authority to give titles, in doing so the state is usurping the authority of schools, colleges and universities who are the only ones authorized to confer degree titles. 

The state has the authority to decide if a person can use a title or work in a given profession, only when they license the profession.  The profession of traditional naturopathy that uses the title Doctor of Naturopathy (N.D.) is not regulated by state licensure; therefore, your state law cannot prohibit traditional naturopaths from working in this field and using their title, if they do they are in violation of federal regulations. 

Concerning the issue raised of your state not distinguishing between traditional naturopathy and conventional naturopathy, it is not the responsibility of the state to distinguish between traditional naturopathy and conventional naturopathy in their statutes.  The two practices are distinguished based on the philosophy of each modality, which determines their core curriculum.  The scope of practice of the Doctor of Naturopathy (N.D.) is based on a nature-science philosophy and the scope of practice of the Doctor of Naturopathic Medicine (N.M.D.) is based on the philosophy of mind, body, spirit and nature; therefore, they are two separate branches of medicine as described in the accompanying document.

Sincerely,

 

Beverly Betancur, N.D.

Chief Executive Officer
 

Cc:  All states


Copyright © 2004.  All rights reserved.